He alleged that the Congress had failed to implement several of its key assurances, including the promised farm loan waiver of Rs 2 lakh for each farmer.
Contradicted by the available records, with nothing located in support.
Credible records exist on both sides.
A figure failing verification says nothing about whether the underlying concern is legitimate. VIGIL rules on assertions, one at a time, and it is routine for a real grievance to travel attached to a number that is wrong. Correcting the number is not the same as answering the grievance.
See the other claims on this subject →Restatement volume is recorded because it tells you how far something travelled. It contributes nothing to the verdict. A claim repeated a thousand times by accounts that all read the same original post has been corroborated zero times.
- 02 Sep 17:50first observed · 200000 INREarliest record DRISHTI holds carrying this assertion — The Hans India — Telangana.The record →
- 02 Sep 17:50verdict changedVIGIL settled on "disputed". Contradicted by the available records, with nothing located in support.
Every moment above comes from one source. A claim that only one publisher has touched has no independent history, however many times that publisher repeated it.
Though the party had promised a loan waiver involving about Rs 49,000 crore, only around Rs 18,000 crore had been implemented, he claimed.
States ₹49,000 crore where the claim states ₹2 lakh — a 2450000.0x divergence on the same assertion. Source tier: original_reporting — outlet's own reporting.
No record independently establishing this assertion has been located.
- ATLASclaimsDeterministic ruleclaims.extract@1.0.002 Sep 17:50Entities, topics, places and stance
Extracted as a checkable assertion (checkability 0.85). predicate "was_promised" matched at offset 98; quantity ₹2 lakh bound at a distance of 32 characters; subject resolved to "crop loan waiver" from the clause; topics: opposition_politics, agriculture. Claim identity key: was_promised|200000|INR|crop_loan_waiver.
1 input reference
- VIGILverificationDeterministic rulevigil@1.0.002 Sep 20:04Evidence-based verification
Status disputed at 41% confidence. Claim origin is original_reporting evidence. 0 supporting, 1 contradicting, 0 restating, 0 contextual records examined; weighted support 0.00 vs weighted contradiction 0.70.
1 input reference
Each step names the agent that ran it, the method it used and the version of the rules or model behind it. A step describing what it did not find is recorded on the same footing as one that found something, so that gaps in the analysis are visible rather than absent.