Though the party had promised a loan waiver involving about Rs 49,000 crore, only around Rs 18,000 crore had been implemented, he claimed.
Contradicted by the available records, with nothing located in support.
Credible records exist on both sides.
A figure failing verification says nothing about whether the underlying concern is legitimate. VIGIL rules on assertions, one at a time, and it is routine for a real grievance to travel attached to a number that is wrong. Correcting the number is not the same as answering the grievance.
See the other claims on this subject →Restatement volume is recorded because it tells you how far something travelled. It contributes nothing to the verdict. A claim repeated a thousand times by accounts that all read the same original post has been corroborated zero times.
- 02 Sep 17:50first observed · 490000000000 INREarliest record DRISHTI holds carrying this assertion — The Hans India — Telangana.The record →
- 02 Sep 17:50verdict changedVIGIL settled on "disputed". Contradicted by the available records, with nothing located in support.
Every moment above comes from one source. A claim that only one publisher has touched has no independent history, however many times that publisher repeated it.
He alleged that the Congress had failed to implement several of its key assurances, including the promised farm loan waiver of Rs 2 lakh for each farmer.
States ₹2 lakh where the claim states ₹49,000 crore — a 2450000.0x divergence on the same assertion. Source tier: original_reporting — outlet's own reporting.
No record independently establishing this assertion has been located.
- ATLASclaimsDeterministic ruleclaims.extract@1.0.002 Sep 17:50Entities, topics, places and stance
Extracted as a checkable assertion (checkability 0.85). predicate "was_promised" matched at offset 21; quantity ₹49,000 crore bound at a distance of 42 characters; subject resolved to "crop loan waiver" from the clause; topics: opposition_politics, agriculture. Claim identity key: was_promised|490000000000|INR|crop_loan_waiver.
1 input reference
- VIGILverificationDeterministic rulevigil@1.0.002 Sep 20:04Evidence-based verification
Status disputed at 41% confidence. Claim origin is original_reporting evidence. 0 supporting, 1 contradicting, 0 restating, 0 contextual records examined; weighted support 0.00 vs weighted contradiction 0.70.
1 input reference
Each step names the agent that ran it, the method it used and the version of the rules or model behind it. A step describing what it did not find is recorded on the same footing as one that found something, so that gaps in the analysis are visible rather than absent.