As graft peaks in Town Planning wing… Illegal constructions mushroom across Hyderabad
As graft peaks in Town Planning wing… Illegal constructions
mushroom across Hyderabad
Hyderabad: With many of the Town Planning officials carrying a price to look the other way, it is but natural that unauthorised constructions and illegal structures continue to mushroom across the Greater Hyderabad region.
There are widespread allegations that corrupt officials are turning a blind eye to deviations from sanctioned plans, casting of slabs to build additional illegal floors, and brazen construction of additional floors in violation of the Floor Space Index (FSI) or Floor Area Ratio (FAR) allowed for the plot.
There are allegations that illegal slabs and additional floors are coming up because ‘smart builders’ – those having nexus with netas and officials -- are being allegedly asked to pay, say Rs 1 lakh and more for each unauthorised slab.
In several parts of the city, buildings approved for a specified number of floors are being expanded vertically, with additional floors being constructed without the required permissions. Residents and complainants allege that the violations are not taking place in secrecy, but under the watch of higher officials in Town Planning and other related departments.
The modus operandi involves obtaining permission for a smaller structure and thereafter adding multiple floors after bribing civic officials. In most cases, by the time action is initiated, the structures are often completed and occupied, making demolition or other enforcement considerably more difficult.
The Town Planning Departments of the three municipal corporations have inured themselves to charges of graft so much so that activists describe them as “cesspools of corruption”.
Well-meaning officials have identified around 2,000 unauthorised constructions across the core urban region in Hyderabad. The violations range from the construction of unauthorised additional floors and encroachment of govt and private lands, failure to maintain mandatory setbacks, and casting of slabs without the required approvals.
According to residents, illegal constructions are allowed to continue after payments are made to officials. It is claimed that Town Planning officers charge not less than Rs 1 lakh and up to Rs 5 lakh for every unauthorised slab, depending on the size of the property and locality, with shares of the collections reportedly going to various officers, and, in some cases to local netas.
Asif Hussain Sohail, president of the Jubilee Hills Constituency Colonies Forum, said that those raising their voice against unauthorised constructions are facing threats. He claimed that the collection could amount to Rs 2 lakh per slab and more in Tolichowki area, with the amounts allegedly being shared among officials, public representatives, and political leaders.
He amplifies: “As per officials, the unauthorised constructions are being detected and notices are issued. Why do several structures continue to rise floor after floor?” he asked.
“On plots measuring just 100 to 150 square yards, six to eight floors are a common sight in the area. There are more than 100 such buildings across various colonies, and constructions are still continuing,” he added.
Asif Hussain demanded a Special Investigation Team (SIT) inquiry into the alleged nexus between officials, local political representatives, and builders on illegal constructions.
K Venkatesh, a resident of Uppal, highlighted how the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation gave permissions for constructing huge buildings even on small land parcels of less than 100 sq yards. He said illegal constructions were due to negligence of the civic body and blamed the GHMC and local leaders who are hand in glove.
“Residents are facing problems with inadequate water supply and sewerage systems. Also, fire safety issues with mandatory setbacks are not being maintained. Such buildings are becoming death traps during emergencies,” he observed.
Mohammed Ahmed, a resident of Old city, said that several localities in the Old city have unauthorized structures. Every other construction is illegal. There are hundreds of structures which have G+5 and G+6 floors with basements, despite permission for only G+2 and G+3 floors.
“Even after complaints to the GHMC, nothing has been done. Constructions are on at a fast pace. It seems civic authorities and local leaders have joined hands to promote illegal constructions in the Old City,” he added.
Is the reported event good or bad news, independent of who is describing it?
Is the author supportive of or critical toward the subject? Kept separate from the event.
Inferred from engagement shape where the platform exposes it. Absent here means absent, not neutral.
Sentiment directed specifically at the tracked subject, scoped to the sentence naming them.
Never flips a label. It only reduces confidence.
Threshold for inclusion is 0.35.
- positive-event terms: sanctioned, completed, approved
- critical markers: negligence, corruption, failure
- critical language appears inside attributed quotation in a reporting outlet — recorded as neutral reporting of criticism
- criticism present in the item is attributed to a quoted actor, not the publisher
- no audience reaction data available for this item
- the tracked subject is not named — no subject-directed sentiment is asserted
- Hyderabadmatched “Hyderabad” via exact · chars 75–84
- Hyderabadmatched “Hyderabad” via exact · chars 160–169
- Hyderabadmatched “Hyderabad” via exact · chars 170–179
- Hyderabadmatched “Hyderabad” via exact · chars 373–382
- Hyderabadmatched “Hyderabad” via exact · chars 1864–1873
- Hyderabadmatched “Hyderabad” via exact · chars 3445–3454
- Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporationmatched “Municipal Corporation” via exact · chars 3455–3476
- Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporationmatched “GHMC” via exact · chars 3665–3669
- Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporationmatched “GHMC” via exact · chars 4236–4240
- Municipal Services0.39terms: ghmc, municipal, civic body
- Opposition & Political Contest0.32terms: allegations, failure
- Drinking Water0.16terms: water supply
- Urban Infrastructure0.13terms: encroachment
- Hyderabad0.95explicit mention · “Greater Hyderabad”
- Medchal Malkajgiri0.88explicit mention · “Uppal”
- references government entities: org.ghmc
- policy-relevant topic "municipal_services" (weight 0.39)
- names a Telangana place explicitly (hyderabad)
- SCOUTacquireDeterministic ruleconnector:live.media.hansindia02 Sep 01:41Acquires source material
Captured from The Hans India — Telangana. Stored verbatim; this record is never modified.
- LINGUAlanguageLexicon modellingua@1.0.002 Sep 01:41Language identification and translation
Detected en/latin at 90% confidence. telugu glyphs 0 (0%); latin glyphs 3704 (100%); no romanized-telugu markers. No translation required or available.
1 input reference
- ATLASentitiesLexicon modelatlas@1.0.0+lexicon@1.0.002 Sep 01:41Entities, topics, places and stance
Linked 9 entity mention(s). exact alias "Municipal Corporation" -> org.ghmc; exact alias "Hyderabad" -> place.hyderabad_city; exact alias "Hyderabad" -> place.hyderabad_city; exact alias "Hyderabad" -> place.hyderabad_city.
1 input reference
- ATLAStopicsLexicon modelatlas@1.0.0+lexicon@1.0.002 Sep 01:41Entities, topics, places and stance
Topics: municipal_services: ghmc, municipal, civic body | opposition_politics: allegations, failure | water: water supply | urban_infrastructure: encroachment.
- ATLASlocationDeterministic ruleatlas@1.0.0+lexicon@1.0.002 Sep 01:41Entities, topics, places and stance
"Greater Hyderabad" (district) -> hyderabad; "Hyderabad" (district) -> hyderabad; "Old City" (locality) -> hyderabad; "Uppal" (locality) -> medchal_malkajgiri
- ATLASrelevanceDeterministic ruleatlas@1.0.0+lexicon@1.0.002 Sep 01:41Entities, topics, places and stance
Relevance 0.70. references government entities: org.ghmc; policy-relevant topic "municipal_services" (weight 0.39); names a Telangana place explicitly (hyderabad).
- ATLASstanceLexicon modelinterpret@1.0.0+lexicon@1.0.002 Sep 01:41Entities, topics, places and stance
Event valence positive; author stance neutral_reporting; intent question; emotion none. positive-event terms: sanctioned, completed, approved; critical markers: negligence, corruption, failure; critical language appears inside attributed quotation in a reporting outlet — recorded as neutral reporting of criticism. Caveats: criticism present in the item is attributed to a quoted actor, not the publisher; no audience reaction data available for this item; the tracked subject is not named — no subject-directed sentiment is asserted.
- WEAVERstory clusterStatisticalweaver.cluster@1.0.002 Sep 01:41Deduplication, stories and narratives
Opened a new story cluster; best match against existing clusters scored 0.27 (threshold 0.34).
1 input reference
Each step names the agent that ran it, the method it used and the version of the rules or model behind it. A step describing what it did not find is recorded on the same footing as one that found something, so that gaps in the analysis are visible rather than absent.